Brief screening for distress among healthcare professionals: psychometric properties of the physician well-being index—Spanish version

Simple item page
dc.contributor.affiliationGlobal Mental Health Research Center, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City 14370, Mexico
dc.contributor.emailreberobles@imp.edu.mx
dc.creatorRobles, Rebecaes_ES
dc.creatorFresán, Anaes_ES
dc.creatorAlcocer-Castillejos, Natashaes_ES
dc.creatorReal-Ramírez, Janetes_ES
dc.creatorMorales-Chainé, Silviaes_ES
dc.creator.identificadorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-7393 (Robles, Rebeca)
dc.creator.identificadorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-6988 (Fresán, Ana)
dc.creator.identificadorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-6157 (Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha)
dc.creator.identificadorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-0848 (Real-Ramírez, Janet)
dc.creator.identificadorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-7877 (Morales-Chainé, Silvia)
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T17:43:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-27T15:30:26Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T17:43:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.published2022
dc.descriptionBackground: The Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) is a brief, valid, reliable self-assessment instrument to identify health professionals' distress and those in need of an intervention. Objective: to evaluate the construct, predictive validity (of depression, suicidal ideation, insomnia, and generalized anxiety), and internal consistency of the 7-item Spanish version of the PWBI (PWBI-S). Methods: out of a national population of approximately 1 million Mexican healthcare professionals, a sample of 3506 subjects (42.0% physicians, 28.7% nurses and 29.3% psychologists) completed an online survey between 17 April and 7 May 2020, at the time of the COVID-19 case cluster transmission scenario in Mexico. Results: In the three sub-samples, PWBI-S's Confirmatory factor analyses (adding residual covariances) exhibited adequate goodness of fit indices for the PWBS original unidimensional model. Overall Cronbach's alphas were 0.89 for physicians, 0.90 for nurses, and 0.86 for psychologists. Univariate logistic regression models showed that a cutoff point of 3 on the total score of the PWBI-S was generally related to the presence of depression, suicidal ideation, and insomnia, but not with generalized anxiety among nurses and psychologists. When trying with a cutoff point of 3, a relationship with GA was shown in psychologists, but not in nurses. Conclusions: our findings suggest that PWBI-S is a valid, reliable measure for clinical and research purposes in the field.es_ES
dc.formatPDFes_ES
dc.identifierJC32DIEP22es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19159451
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.organizacionInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.identifier.placeSuiza
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159451
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/8074
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation19(15):9451
dc.relation.jnabreviadoINT J ENVIRON RES PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.rightsAcceso Abiertoes_ES
dc.subject.kwHealthcare workers
dc.subject.kwMental health
dc.subject.kwDistress
dc.subject.kwEvaluation
dc.subject.kwWell-being Index
dc.titleBrief screening for distress among healthcare professionals: psychometric properties of the physician well-being index—Spanish versiones_ES

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos de revista