Neurocognition in bipolar and depressive schizoaffective disorder: a comparison with schizophrenia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.affiliationCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla de Baz, Mexico.
dc.contributor.emailale.mondragon@comunidad.unam.mx
dc.creatorMondragón-Maya, Alejandraes_ES
dc.creatorFlores-Medina, Yvonnees_ES
dc.creatorSilva-Pereyra, Juanes_ES
dc.creatorRamos-Mastache, Danielaes_ES
dc.creatorYáñez-Téllez, Guillerminaes_ES
dc.creatorEscamilla-Orozco, Raúles_ES
dc.creatorSaracco-Álvarez, Ricardoes_ES
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T16:47:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-27T15:26:44Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T16:47:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.published2020
dc.descriptionIntroduction: Schizoaffective disorder (SA) is classified into bipolar (bSA) and depressive (dSA) subtypes. Although clinical differences between both have been reported, there is no clear information regarding their specific cognitive profile. Objective: To compare neurocognition between SA subtypes and schizophrenia (SC). Methods: A total of 61 patients were assessed and divided into 3 groups: 35 SC, 16 bSA, and 10 dSA. All participants signed an informed consent letter. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Central and South American version was used to assess neurocognition. The study was performed at the Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría "Ramón de la Fuente". Participants were identified by specialized psychiatrists. Trained neuropsychologists carried out the clinical and cognitive assessment, which lasted 2 h approximately. Results: The cognitive assessment showed a significant difference in Trail Making Test part A subtest (F[2,58] = 4.043; p = 0.023]. Post hoc analyses indicated that dSA obtained a significantly higher score than SC (MD = -11.523; p = 0.018). The f test showed a large effect size (f = 0.401). No statistical differences were observed regarding other cognitive variables. Conclusions: The cognitive profile of SA subtypes and SC is similar since no differences were found in most subtests. However, dSA may be less impaired than SC in measures of processing speed. Further research with larger samples must be conducted.es_ES
dc.formatPDFes_ES
dc.identifierOE04DSC20es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000508188
dc.identifier.eissn1423-0224
dc.identifier.issn0302-282X
dc.identifier.organizacionInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.identifier.placeSuiza
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000508188
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/7788
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherKargeres_ES
dc.relation80(1): 45-51
dc.relation.jnabreviadoNEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY
dc.relation.journalNeuropsychobiology
dc.rightsAcceso Cerradoes_ES
dc.subject.kwAffective disorders
dc.subject.kwNeurocognition
dc.subject.kwNeuropsychology
dc.subject.kwPsychosis
dc.subject.kwPsychotic disorders
dc.titleNeurocognition in bipolar and depressive schizoaffective disorder: a comparison with schizophreniaes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos de revista